Freedom of the Press – A Nation Worth Having

I have stepped away from this blog for the past few weeks to see how you might change as you approach your presidency.

You haven’t.

I could have supported your presidency if only you had said, “U.S. intelligence showed me the facts. Putin tried to destroy our election and our democracy and he will pay a price so this will not continue.”

But, you didn’t. You didn’t come close.

Instead, you attacked our intelligence community. They gave you inconvenient facts. You minimized them before the world. You said other countries hack, too. True but nowhere near the point.

You didn’t stop there. You told us Putin liked you “and isn’t that a good thing”. Your being Our President is not about you or your Brand. It’s about the good of the nation. They are not the same thing.
Continue reading “An Open Letter to Donald Trump as You become Our 45th President”

free-press

“Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.” A.J. Liebling

Today’s headline – “Viral Fake Election News Outperformed Real News on Facebook in Final Months of the U.S. Election” – got me thinking about how we got to this dangerous place.

Many years ago, while in college, I remember a Sociology professor discussing then new statistics that showed, for the first time, more people were getting their news from TV than from newspapers. He made the point that TV news pieces were by definition brief and that the deeper analysis offered by newspapers would fade. He described this as a danger to democracy.

In those days, TV news departments were seen as a public service. As time went by, that value was decayed by networks and stations whose values shifted to profit as their business became more competitive.

Almost two decades ago, in 1999, Marc Gunther authored a report for the Nieman Foundation. Titled, The Transformation of Network News: How Profitability Has Moved Networks Out of Hard News, Gunther opened the document with these words: Continue reading “Freedom of the Press: An essential value”

About this blog

Before the 2016 Clinton-Trump Presidential election, the most important election in my lifetime was the 2002 Georgia Senatorial election. It set the path for our decaying politics. It assaulted the values that had truly made and kept America great. It set a pattern for today.

In that election, Senator Max Cleland was challenged by Saxby Chambliss. Chambliss was far behind as election day came close. He had nothing to lose and did something that in the past would have been attacked as despicable and, indeed, contrary to American values. He attacked Senator Cleland as weak on defense. The tool he used was a Cleland vote on amending the Chemical Weapons Treaty. That amendment passed 56-44 with Cleland being on the same side as Senator Bill Frist, then head of the Senate committee that picked Chambliss to run against Cleland. Chambliss accused Cleland of “breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution”.

Well, we’re used to politicians twisting the truth, so why was this a step toward changing American values?

Max Cleland was a former Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. At the age of 25, while in Viet Nam as a Captain in the U.S. Army, Max Cleland lost both his legs and one arm in service to his nation. To attack such a man as anything other than a patriot would have been unthinkable before that 2002 election.

Chambliss reversed the polls, won the election and changed our politics to this day. Others saw what he had done and learned. The new formula was simple and profoundly cynical: find a strength in your opponent and transform it to a weakness.

The formula has been repeated over and over ever since. Most recently, we have seen it in our 2016 election where a candidate who served (with good popularity) as Senator and Secretary of State has been subjected to years of Congressional hearings, as she emerged as a strong candidate for President.

The evolving result has been a loss of common national values.

The Republican and Democratic tribes do not do the business of the nation. They do not pass budgets. They do not stand unified at the water’s edge against nations that would do us harm. They focus on partisan interest and the destruction of each other.

When they fail, they do not apologize and seriously commit to work to the common good. They say citizens want them to be stronger in pushing their philosophies. They claim mandate, rather than the reality that citizens are limited by the rules they have set to a binary choice.

In truth, their philosophies are meaningless to most Americans. They are too often used to generate anger with ideas as a tagline.

Citizens simply want America to work…to bring us jobs and stability. We want people who will talk to each other, listen and find – or create – common ground. That is leadership in a democracy – if we want to keep it.

This introduction is to a new blog dedicated to values. It is about people who put themselves second to others. It is about a future worth having. It will include stories about heroes I and others have met or observed, a little history and, perhaps, a few thoughts

Welcome to A Nation Worth Having: A blog about binding values.